SOFFY
Why these verbs travel, knife, permit, prefer refer are without double consonant in past of regular? Past simple of regular verbs According to the rules we have to double the final consonant in these way: Travel Travelled Knife kniffed permit permitted prefer preferred refer referred But these verbs aren't doubled... why? and in this case transmit is Transmitted why we double the verb here?
٦ يونيو ٢٠١٦ ٠٢:١٠
الإجابات · 6
1
Your question and examples are rather confused, but this is the rule: You double the consonant if you have the combination CVC (consonant/vowel/consonant) as the last three letters of the word. This applies to single-syllable words (such as 'rip') and to polysyllabic words where the last syllable bears the stress ( such as 'refer'). rip --> ripped trim --> trimmed hug --> hugged knit --> knitted tip --> tipped and refer --> referred permit --> permitted These are the only cases where the consonant is doubled. The past tense of 'knife' is 'knifed'. This is similar to hope' --> hoped, style --> styled, and so on - if you have an 'e' at the end of the word, you just add a 'd'. One grey area is verbs ending in 'l' which are spelt - or 'spelled' :) - with a single 'l' in US English (traveled), but a double 'l' in British English (travelled) even though the last syllable isn't stressed.
٦ يونيو ٢٠١٦
1
Actually, prefer, permit, and refer do get double consonants when put into past tense. (preferred, permitted, referred) In Britain, I believe travel gets a double consonant as well. I don't know why knife doesn't though... perhaps it has something to do with the long 'i' sound and silent 'e.' Or the fact that 'kinfe' ends in a vowel and the others end in a consonant. I hope someone knows!
٦ يونيو ٢٠١٦
1
Either it is too early morning for me, or you have a mistake there. It should be "knifed". And "traveled" is also OK. "travelled" is mostly British way of saying it.
٦ يونيو ٢٠١٦
لم تجد إجاباتك بعد؟
اكتب اسألتك ودع الناطقين الأصليين باللغات يساعدونك!