Für Sie
Themen für Sie
Another query about a complex sentence. But for the poems that describe without any reserve that dynamic vital force which draws a man and a woman close together and that impact of hot feeling upon hot feeling, search where we will, we shall search in vain.(original) Query: Is the original grammatically correct? For the sake of making the original concise, I name the complex noun phrase as A , ie. A = the poems that describe without any reserve that dynamic vital force which draws a man and a woman close together and that impact of hot feeling upon hot feeling. (I understand A very well) so the original is such as: But for A, search where we will, we shall search in vain. = (I guess:) Without A, even if we search for A where we will search for A , we shall search in vain. but I extremely doubt the correctness of my guess.
2. Sep. 2024 12:04
6
1
Each time, when someone ask me which city can be the best destination worth travelling, the first place comes to my mind is Xi'an which is also the ancient capital of the Tang dynasty. Every day, people around the world come over to experience the Chinese culture. We often say that if Beijing is the biggest branch of Chinese culture, Xi'an is the root. When I stand in front of the Big Wild Goose Pagoda, it gives me a feeling that I am just living in the Tang Dynasty and listening to the bell from the tower as those poets did 1500 years ago. Xi'an has a high place in each Chinese person's heart. It's mixed skyscrapers and heritages. During daytime, we call it Xi'an, bur at night we call it Chang'an. We can wear the traditional clothes and experience the life of the Tang dynasty. The famous pedestrian street Da Tang Buyecheng opens for 24 hours with marvelous performances and great stores which attracts every visitor's attention.
3. Sep. 2024 03:59
1
0
Everyone today should pay a small amount from their income to help people who are suffering great poverty. To what extent do you agree? The wealth gap is increasing today; it is said the richest 1% of the world population own the 50% of the world wealth, while about 7 million people live in poverty. Some say everyone should pay a small amount from their income to support those who in need, but I would rather disagree with this opinion if it means everyone contributes the same amount. It is because poorer people carry heavier responsibility with flat rate taxes. It is unfair that the rich and poor carry the same responsibility regardless of their income levels. People make different amounts of money, and the ability for contribution vary. It is ludicrous to take the small amount from the people living in poverty. Similarly, it is not reasonable to impose the same amount on people earning just above the poverty line as the rich. There is simply no room for them to pay for others. Therefore, asking everyone is unacceptable. On the other hand, if the small amount is meant to change in accordance with the income, the statement could be justifiable. Obviously, people facing financial difficulties should pay nothing. The lower-middle class are encouraged to pay relatively smaller amount. The people considered to earn more than confortable income should make larger commitment. In conclusion, although it is necessary to assist people in escaping from poverty, people should pay different amounts according to their income.
2. Sep. 2024 16:49
3
1
Mehr anzeigen