Mike

It was a wonderful lesson! Mike is a super-professional English teacher. He not only explains well but also feels when the student finds it difficult to answer and selects simpler words and expressions. Thanks a lot to Mike for your patience and your time! Sincerely, your student, Sergio! I recommend this teacher to everyone! Это был замечательный урок! Майк сверх-профессионалный учитель английского. Он не только хорошо объясняет, но и прекрасно чувствует когда ученик затрудняется ответить и подбирает более простые слова и выражения. Большое спасибо Майк за терпение и за Ваше время! С глубоким уважением, ваш ученик, Серджио! Рекомендую всем данного преподавателя!

It's really enjoyable talking with you and sharing with you some of my experience, you are absolutely a devoted teacher who helps me with my English speaking!, Thank you so much for your effort in our session.

A psychological study has shown that our estimations are also highly sensitive to contextual influences: when presented with the same set of 30 dots, we tend to underestimate their number if they are surrounded by only 10 dots, yet overestimate them if surrounded by 100 dots. This illustrates how easily our judgment is swayed by surrounding circumstances—during bull markets, we believe stocks will rise forever; in bear markets, we lose all confidence entirely. This susceptibility is even more pronounced when it comes to our assessments of current events or historical trends. In this light, Hegel’s maxim deserves deep reflection: “The march of world history stands outside virtue, vice, and justice.”

Mike is a great teacher. I enjoy every class with Mike. He is helpful and supportive. If you want to improve your writing skills, Mike is the best teacher who can help you reach a goal.

Does history inherently possess a sense of purpose? Or does it, as Hegel suggested, ultimately gravitate toward a transcendent, quasi-religious goal? The answer remains decidedly uncertain. While all living beings possess the power to "write" their own histories—leaving behind specimens or various chemical traces—written history remains a uniquely human endeavor. This structural act dictates that history is rooted in human nature and, consequently, characterized by a degree of path dependency. However, as AI emerges as a secondary protagonist in human society and algorithms begin to dominate our lives, the authorship of history is no longer entirely within human hands. This is further complicated by the occasional appearance of ambitious leaders who possess the power to rewrite human history. To some extent, these factors have pushed history into what finance calls a "random walk"—a pattern of unpredictable movement.

When Lord Acton stated, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely," he did not specify that this phenomenon is necessarily confined to any particular political system. Power exists within every political framework; it is just that some systems possess a stronger inclination toward the separation of powers. Yet, is such an inclination inherently permanent? When leaders in democratic nations begin to suppress freedom of speech, openly vilify political rivals, and shift all blame onto their opponents, is it possible that, in the long run, the "arc of history" might shift its trajectory, leading these nations away from the democracy they once knew?