Discuass the natural talents and nurture training The relative importance of natural talents and nurture training is a hot issue and has ignited a public debate about whether natural or nurture is more significant in areas, for example, such as sport and music. Many believe that talents are the gift conferred by the nature, inborn and instinctive, one of the essential ingredients to success. It seems stand to reasons, a young man, for instance, who is only 16 years old but has a height of 190cm inherited from his parents is supposed to play basketball without doubt. Furthermore, with well training, he is capable of outstanding achievement in basketball, while those hard-working players could hardly reach a comparable level without enough height. However, our education system is based on a belief that all children can be effectively taught to acquire this or that skill. In other words, nurture training is a way to complement the natural deficiency. We often read in news something analogous that a man, who had been failing to attain his goal, now has made his way up to a certain high after years practicing. I personally think that some people do have talents that are probably inherited through their genes. Such talents can give individuals a facility for certain skills, but these are not the whole things. A good musicians or brilliant sports star has probably succeeded because of both good training and natural talent. Without the training, a man would not know how to develop their talent, and without the natural talent, continues training would be more hard and inefficient. By and large, I agree that a man can rises by teaching and training, but in areas such as music, art or sport, some natural talent is required.