Nanako
"trace of scar" Hi there, Could someone please tell me if the following sentence sounds weird? ■There was no ”trace of scar" after the doctor took off the bandages. I believe "scar" means a mark left on part of the body after an injury, and trace means a sign that something has happened or existed. If this is right, does this phrase ”trace of scar" sound like that I am repeating the synonyms(like "a mark of a mark of a scar"), which sounds weird? I'm sorry if my questions is not very clear. Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks, Nanako
Jan 8, 2019 10:42 AM
Answers · 2
No, it isn't weird at all. The phrase is fine. It means that there wasn't even the slightest scar. A scar left by a wound or surgery is very much a real and concrete thing, so it makes perfect sense to say that there wasn't (even) a trace of one.
January 8, 2019
It is more like saying there was no visible image of the scar. No need to comment a thanks...I take it that you have done so.
January 8, 2019
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!