As far as I am concerned, it’s inconvenient for me to wait 2 days. Why can’t we just pick the lessons out from teacher’s slots without waiting for accepting them? Isn’t it inconvenient for teachers as well? I also use other sites which allow students to book the lessons in straighforward way, which is easier and quicker than here.
What is your opinion about that?
I personally like the choice not accept the lesson request, because italki makes it hard to put short pauses (15 min) between lessons, and some days, I just can't talk for 3+ hours straight. Also, some teachers only work with certain age groups and levels, but students who don't fit these criteria try to book anyway. The delay allows teachers to say no to students they can't help or to request more information if the student has an incomplete profile.
As a student, I do find it a little annoying if a teacher doesn't reply within 24h, but it usually tells me this is probably not the right teacher for me: too busy, not super responsive, teaching online not a priority, not really enthusiastic. If a teacher allows a request to expire with no response, I will not book another lesson. If a teacher responds slowly, I give him/her a chance but in my experience, teachers who aren't on top of it when accepting requests, maintaining accurate availability, and communicating clearly about any changes, are usually not that reliable (late constantly, not prepared, chaotic environment) and I choose not to continue our work together. Punctuality and being reliable are very important qualities to me in a teacher, and this feature of italki helps me decide who is the right fit.
Guyomar,
your point makes sense to me. I agree.
I am reliable, punctual, I take action quite quickly or I want to plan my studying in advance and seriously, so, I expect the same from my teachers. I prefer responsive and commited teachers. Luckily I have those ones.
I was just wondering why there is 48-hour policy.
Thanks for your contributions.
