Ruzanna
Good afternoon. Can you please tell me why this phrase uses 'for'? And if you remove 'for' from the sentence, will it be a mistake or will the meaning of the sentence change? The phrase: They were there for only two months when a neighbor's dog jumped over the fence. Thanks
2023년 6월 7일 오전 10:23
답변 · 6
"For" is optional. The meaning does not change if you omit it. In general, periods of time do not require a preposition: "I slept eight hours", or "He's been studying English eight years". However, some expressions do require "for": "It feels like I've been waiting forever". You can't say "I've been waiting ever". "For one brief moment it I felt truly happy". "For the duration of the movie I felt hungry"
2023년 6월 7일
2023년 6월 9일
'For' in your sentence introduces the length of time of the action. It would be totally incorrect without it.
2023년 6월 8일
Good afternoon! In the phrase, "They were there for only two months when a neighbor's dog jumped over the fence," the word "for" is used to indicate the duration or period of time that "they" (referring to a group of individuals) were present or stayed at a particular location. If you remove the word "for" from the sentence, it would still be grammatically correct, but the meaning of the sentence would change slightly. The revised sentence would be: "They were there only two months when a neighbor's dog jumped over the fence." In this case, without the word "for," the sentence suggests that "they" were present or stayed at the location for exactly two months, emphasizing the specific duration. The original sentence with "for" implies that they were there for a period of two months but does not provide information about the exact length of time. Both versions are grammatically acceptable, but the choice to include or exclude "for" depends on the intended emphasis and the level of detail you want to convey.
2023년 6월 7일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!