italki378720
Hi Can you help me? I have a question. Which one is correct or more natural? 1. I had a spell at ABC Company for 3 years ago. 2. I worked at ABC Company for 3 years ago. Thanks in advance
2022년 4월 22일 오전 7:58
답변 · 7
The comment below is incorrect. You can, "Work there for a spell," but usage of this might be regional. As an Australian English speaker, I would understand it, and I would suppose native UK speakers would to. But that doesn't mean it's the best option. Neither sentence really strikes me as particularly natural. For example, you can say: I had/worked a spell at ABC three years ago. I worked at ABC until three years ago (or just I worked at ABC three years ago). I would probably go with one of those last two. Using "for" is incorrect. If you opt for 'spell', I'd suggest using this in less formal contexts and for more throwaway conversation. "Oh, I worked there for a spell too a couple of years back." It's not as great a response to an employer's questioning, however. Hope this help.
2022년 4월 22일
Using "a spell" to mean a period of time is correct but rather colloquial and 'folksy'. For most normal usage you're probably better off using no. 2. If you want to say for a period of time 'a while' is more standard.
2022년 4월 23일
Number 2, definitely. Spell means spelling words or a kind of magic. It has no meaning in such a context.
2022년 4월 22일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!