[삭제됨]
Which one is correct? If only he WAS here If only he WERE here.
2013년 8월 18일 오전 11:49
답변 · 4
1
Both are "correct" because native speakers use both. But if you want to follow the rules, then: "If only he WERE here." He is NOT here, so the rules (especially in American English) call for the subjunctive: If I WERE handsome, I would have many girlfriends. (But I am ugly, so ...) If Tom WERE intelligent, he would have a good job. (But he is not intelligent, so ...) If everyone WERE nice, this would be a wonderful world. (Of course, many people are not nice!)
2013년 8월 18일
I don't believe in prescriptive grammar, so the only "rules" for a language are how the language is currently used by native speakers. In this case, both are widely used and widely understood. "If only he were here" is more formal, but the subjunctive is largely archaic in English, and I think just as many people (or more, depending on the area) would say "if only he was here". In the end, I don't think anyone, except grammar nazis, would correct you if you used either in conversation. For writing formal documents, "were" would be slightly preferred.
2013년 8월 19일
If only he WERE (subjuntivo) here.
2013년 8월 18일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!