markhu26
i feel confused with the logic,is" notoriety "bad fame? while suggustopedia has gained some notoriety through success in the teaxhing of mordern languages,few teachers are ablw to emulate the spectacular results of Nozavec and hia associates.
2015년 7월 22일 오후 1:14
답변 · 3
2
Yes, the others have said it: notorious suggests 'bad fame' but 'notoriety' could actually be used for both bad and good sorts.
2015년 7월 22일
1
It depends on the usage, and the words that follow. If something has 'gained notoriety' with regards to something positive (teaching of modern languages), then it is a good sort of fame. "Notorious for..." is really only used to express a negative/infamy. For example "Suggustopedia was notorious for teaching languages poorly..." However, you might hear it used in comedy to express a positive because they would be opposing words: "He was notorious for being a good father."
2015년 7월 22일
1
Yes, that's a good simple definition. If someone is "notorious" they are well-known but for something that is not good, or that not everyone thinks is good. Another similar word is "infamous" which doesn't mean "not-famous" but "bad-famous" or "famous for bad".
2015년 7월 22일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!