Farhana Qureishi
Could anyone please explain which one is the correct option for the part in bold here? ▪ In 1923, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝘂𝗺 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗶𝗮 𝗮𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 ruling that it was a form of price-fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract. (A) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and (B) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and (C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, (D) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, (E) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,
18 nov. 2023 23:06
Antwoorden · 3
C is the only possible correct answer. This is tricky because it is a long phrase that is being substituted and it is difficult to keep the entire sentence in one's head. If we shorten it a bit, it is clearer, I think. (C) becomes then "The Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage, ruling that it was a form of price-fixing. The other options are either incomplete sentences (E) or only work if we change "ruling" to "ruled" (A and B) or require us to rearrange the sentence (D). This question takes some very careful reading!
19 november 2023
Hi. I’m a native English speaker and a lawyer. While each of the statements is reasonable, each can be improved. If you must choose from these, “D” is best. One problem is the word “declared.” Better choices would be “struck down” or “ruled,” because the Supreme Court doesn’t really make declarations. It decides if a law is constitutional or not. A smaller problem is that the phrase “minimum wage” is incomplete here. A better choice might be “minimum wage law”. A minimum wage is a concept; the Supreme Court didn’t reject the concept, per se. It rejected a DC law establishing a minimum wage for women (or more precisely, establishing a board to oversee minimum allowed wages). Consider his alternative: “In 1923, the Supreme Court struck down a District of Columbia law mandating minimum wage requirements for women. The court ruled that the law unconstitutionally infringed upon the rights of employers and employees to contract on their own terms, as protected by the Fifth Amendment.” I hope this helps.
19 november 2023
A, B, C, and D are all correct. What a strange question! Actually, all of them are technically wrong. It was the law establishing the minimum wage that was declared unconstitutional, if you want to get picky. The Supreme Court cannot issue proclamations about what should or should not be. That would be a law. Only Congress can make laws.
18 november 2023
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!