Mohammad
I apperciate anyone who answer this question. Thank you in advance I have a problem with combining the words and I appreciate anyone who helps me in this way. when we want to describe a word, as far as I know, there are two ways. 1) adjective+noun Examples: beautiful flower -tall man- clever student obviously we can't use (noun+adjective) groups such as: flower beautiful - man tall- student clever. This is quite obvious. 2) but sometimes we use noun as an adjective (noun as adjective+ real noun) Examples: race horse- history teacher- people champion and so on in such situation I get quite confused. for example when I want to combine (race and horse), there are two options for me and I can't realize which one is correct grammatically? race horse and horse of race (noun as adjective+real name) or (name+of+second name). how can I solve this problem? how I can realize which one is right? people champion or champion of people?
22 mrt. 2016 13:59
Antwoorden · 8
1
You are asking the basic question of forming NP (noun phrase) in English. Actually, there may be more than two ways to for NP, yet I won't go that far. 1. NP--> adj+N. the focus here is the latter noun, and the adj. before it MODIFIES the feature/character of the N. 2. NP--> N1+N2 the focus is for N2, and the N1 identifies the origin/source of the N2. e.g. silk shirt, book store. Specially, for this case, there mostly are "settled" phrases, like "hot dog" (as the fast food) v.s. "hot dog" (as a dog that is hot). 3.NP--> N1 + of N2 the focus is the N1, and the of N2 signifies the possessor of N1. And this is for nouns of non-living things, like the map of the World, the wall of the classroom, the virtue of honesty. Specifically, when the nouns are living things, we use apostrophe (') to indicate possessor, like The horse's tail, Jim's sister or metaphorically, today's news. Above are the linguistic reasons for your questions if you do want to know why and how thoroughly. Yet it is as simple to fit the rules next time and as the more you learn, the better you understand.
22 maart 2016
Rantao's answer is very good. It may be hard to apply the theory in practice, and so it's important to find authentic examples. I recommend the sentence database fraze.it I searched for "race" + "horse". It's worth checking a few pages as not all results will be relevant. You can then start to identify common patterns. You will notice that no sentences include "horse of race", however many include "racehorse". The more you do this, the more the theory will make sense to you.
22 maart 2016
If people just do not say it that way, why bother which one is correct. Language comes before grammar. I do not know who said similar thing like this. Hope this helps.
22 maart 2016
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!