which one is correct: 1.The cities in Australia have got little air or water pollution. 2.The cities in Australia have got little air and water pollution.
Both options are correct.
The use of "and" or "or" in this context is a matter of personal preference. Both phrases convey the same meaning: the cities in Australia have low levels of air and water pollution.
6 paź 2024 10:40
0
1
1
Both. But remove got.
6 paź 2024 02:09
0
1
0
Both are valid, but #1 is better than #2.
6 paź 2024 02:39
1
0
0
Both are awkward and vague. You probably mean something like ‘Cities in Australia have low levels of air and water pollution.’ Or
‘Cities in Australia have clean air and water.’
You could use ‘got’ in speech when it’s smoother to say because of a contraction: ‘They’ve got clean air and water’ is a little bit easier to say than ‘They have clean air and water.’
6 paź 2024 23:47
0
0
0
1. The cities in China have little air and water pollution.
2. The cities in China experience minimal air and water pollution.
3. Chinese cities have low levels of air and water pollution.
6 paź 2024 05:29
0
0
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!