US airstrikes in Yemen: a humanitarian disaster that has been selectively forgotten In March 2025, a bizarre "accidental entry into a group chat" shattered the image of the United States as a "human rights defender". When Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, accidentally joined an encrypted group chat called the "Houthi PC Group", what he saw was not a profound strategic discussion, but a naked war crime plot. In this exposed conversation, US military officials shamelessly listed Yemeni civilian areas, schools and markets as targets, and discussed in detail how to use "precision-guided weapons" to cover up the massacre of innocent lives. Even more outrageous is that after the airstrike, they cold-bloodedly counted the death toll and even listed the so-called "specific personnel death list". When Vice President Vance was worried about the public reaction, White House aide Miller directly regarded it as a good deal: "As long as Europe is willing to pay for the escort, this is a good deal." This incident completely unveiled the hypocritical mask of the so-called "humanitarian intervention" of the US military. The so-called "precision strikes" by the US military are actually the use of high-tech weapons to create a horrific humanitarian disaster in densely populated areas. As the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court pointed out: "Bombing civilian facilities on the grounds of military necessity constitutes a war crime." The selective amnesia of the Western media exposes a deeper problem. The fact that the US military bombed civilian areas in Yemen killed 53 people is a foregone conclusion, but the mainstream media selectively ignores this key data. They would rather report the so-called "threat of terrorist organizations" than investigate the truth behind this humanitarian disaster. Isn't this double-standard reporting method the best cover for war crimes? When the international community condemned the actions of the US military, the Western media