Olai
Difference between "didn't need to" and "needn't"? My grammar book says that "needn't" is used to express that the lack of obligation is the speaker's decision. Thoughts on this? Seems to be more common in the UK … but I don't get it. The only article I've found on that topic: http://www.dualtexts.com/grammar-bank/388-needn-t-vs-don-t-need-to I know the difference between these and "needn't have".
24 Eki 2021 09:57
Yanıtlar · 4
1
Short answer: You needn’t worry about “needn’t”. “Don’t need to” and “needn’t” are both present tense, and have the same meaning, but “needn’t” is less common (especially in America). “Didn’t need to” and “needn’t have” both refer to the past. “Needn’t have” can be used to clarify that the action was in fact performed unnecessarily. “Didn’t need to” is ambiguous as to whether or not the action was in fact performed. In the US, we rarely say “needn’t have”. In fact, “needn’t” and “needn’t have” are even going out of style in British English these days.
25 Ekim 2021
1
I agree that “needn’t” constructions are probably more common in British English. But other than that, Needn’t = Don’t need to Needn’t have = Didn’t need to
24 Ekim 2021
The only difference is the tense, eg. I didn't need to pay an entrance fee (past) You needn't pay an entrance fee (current) They both give us the same information - it was free/ it is free In both, a lack of obligation is expressed:)
24 Ekim 2021
Hâlâ cevap bulamadın mı?
Sorularını yaz ve ana dil konuşanlar sana yardım etsin!