Zoos should be banned because they are cruel and inhumane. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often a debatable statement that animals are in zoological garden. Some people argue that breeding captured wild animals in cage are cold-blooded acts whereas others insist that inhabiting Zoos have a great number of benefits for wildlife. In this essay, I will deliberately discuss both side of argument.
To begin with, some feel that wild animals that live steel prison need to prohibit due to having negative impact on wild creatures. Firstly, it may deprive them of their wild adaptability and trigger a transition to a tamed pet. Secondly, they would get unimaginable stress when they were caught and were transferred to zoological park. At last but not least, it may also take their liberties and rights away from them like convicts although they did not commit any crime to human being.
On the other hand, some say that maintaining their life at the zoo can provide them with several profits. The first advantage is that they can preserve their own DNA easier than staying in wildness as far as living in cages. By doing so, they can protect against predators’ aggression and infectious diseases. In addition, they would not have to struggle with starvation as they used to live in jungles owing to zookeepers’ care. What is better, they can take a chance to become extinct under the influence of nursing
To sum up, there are some reasons why detaining animals from their habitats have to be ineligible. However, I personally believe that zoological park offer good conditions and advantages to them.