質問
Hello native English speakers. Query about my guess about the one sentence original. Let me quote from that portion of his testimony, which appears on pages 512 and 513, which makes it clear that he wasn't ever claiming that he spotted that verb tense at the time in the Jones deposition, and his silence or his answer was based on spotting the verb tense then. (original) Question: By grammar & logic, what I guess is as follows: ①there is a noun before the preposition "from", which denotes the object of the verb "quote" here but which is omitted(we can not see it); ② both which's are referring to the same "noun" which we can not see due to being omitted; ③ the pronoun "it" here denotes two things : (a.) he wasn't ever claiming that he spotted that verb tense at the time in the Jones deposition, and (b.) his silence or his answer was based on spotting the verb tense then. ④ at the time in the Jones deposition, I guess , = at the time in the Jone's deposition, or rather, at the time when Jone spoke about or claimed his deposition. ⑤ the verb tense then = (my guess) the verb tense which when Jone made his deposition he used at that time. Are my all guesses correct according to grammar and the original? Which is/are wrong?
2024年10月18日 05:26
2
0
詳細を表示する