italki378720
Hi Can you help me? I have a question. Which one is correct or more natural? 1. I had a spell at ABC Company for 3 years ago. 2. I worked at ABC Company for 3 years ago. Thanks in advance
2022年4月22日 07:58
回答 · 7
The comment below is incorrect. You can, "Work there for a spell," but usage of this might be regional. As an Australian English speaker, I would understand it, and I would suppose native UK speakers would to. But that doesn't mean it's the best option. Neither sentence really strikes me as particularly natural. For example, you can say: I had/worked a spell at ABC three years ago. I worked at ABC until three years ago (or just I worked at ABC three years ago). I would probably go with one of those last two. Using "for" is incorrect. If you opt for 'spell', I'd suggest using this in less formal contexts and for more throwaway conversation. "Oh, I worked there for a spell too a couple of years back." It's not as great a response to an employer's questioning, however. Hope this help.
2022年4月22日
Using "a spell" to mean a period of time is correct but rather colloquial and 'folksy'. For most normal usage you're probably better off using no. 2. If you want to say for a period of time 'a while' is more standard.
2022年4月23日
Number 2, definitely. Spell means spelling words or a kind of magic. It has no meaning in such a context.
2022年4月22日
还未找到你的答案吗?
把你的问题写下来,让母语人士来帮助你!